
Strykr Analysis
NeutralStrykr Pulse 55/100. The AI trade is at a crossroads, with volatility and macro headwinds offsetting long-term optimism. Threat Level 3/5.
If you blinked, you missed it: the AI trade, once the poster child for the “Roaring 2020s” narrative, is now looking less like a perpetual motion machine and more like a toddler learning to walk, wobbly, unpredictable, and prone to loud crashes. As of February 2, 2026, the so-called AI basket is in the throes of a volatility spike that has seasoned traders reaching for the TUMS. Weekly moves have become a rollercoaster, with leaders and laggards swapping places faster than you can say “large language model.”
The facts are stark. According to Investors.com, AI stocks have entered a new phase of volatility, upending the easy momentum that defined 2025. The XLK Technology ETF sits frozen at $143.90, refusing to budge, a tableau vivant of indecision. Meanwhile, market chatter is dominated by warnings of an AI bubble, with outlets like The Motley Fool and Seeking Alpha pointing to “complex financial deals” and “elevated valuations.” If you’re looking for price action, you’ll need to look past the surface. Beneath the calm, options activity on XLK and single-name AI darlings has exploded, with implied volatility readings up +35% from January’s lows, and open interest in weekly puts at multi-month highs.
The macro backdrop is no less fraught. The S&P 500 has just hit a new high, only to retreat as President Trump named Kevin Warsh as the next Fed chair. The market’s knee-jerk reaction? A collective side-eye. Warsh’s record is hawkish, and the mere whiff of tighter policy has traders rethinking their love affair with risk assets, especially those trading at 40x sales and promising “AI-powered disruption” as their only moat. Family offices, according to CNBC, are rotating out of tech and into real assets, citing inflation and rate risk. The AI narrative, once bulletproof, now looks vulnerable to the same macro headwinds that have kneecapped every other growth story since the dawn of central banking.
Here’s the real story: the AI trade is no longer a one-way bet. The market’s collective FOMO has given way to a new regime of price discovery, where every earnings miss, every guidance cut, and every regulatory headline can trigger a mini-crash. The days of “just buy the dip” are over, at least for now. The options market is telegraphing a regime shift. Skew is elevated, and dealers are no longer reflexively short puts, they’re hedging both tails. That means more two-way price action, more false breakouts, and more pain for anyone who thinks AI is immune to gravity.
The backdrop is complicated by the Fed transition. Warsh’s nomination is not just a personnel move; it’s a signal. If the new regime leans hawkish, the cost of capital goes up, and the AI trade, built on dreams and discounted cash flows that stretch into the next century, suffers. The market is sniffing this out. The “AI bubble” narrative is gaining traction not just among perma-bears, but among the same fast money crowd that pumped these names to the moon in the first place. The result? Volatility begets volatility. The crowding that juiced returns on the way up now amplifies the downside.
Strykr Watch
Technically, XLK is holding the line at $143.90, but momentum has stalled. The 20-day moving average is flatlining, and RSI has rolled over from overbought territory. Key support sits at $140, with a break below opening the door to a retest of the $135 zone. Resistance remains at the all-time high near $146. Options flow is skewed bearish, with put-call ratios above 1.2 and weekly implied volatility at 31%, up from 23% just three weeks ago. Watch for a volatility cluster, if XLK closes below $140, expect forced de-risking from systematic funds and CTA models.
The bear case is not hard to sketch. If the Fed signals even a modestly hawkish tilt, the AI trade could unwind in spectacular fashion. Elevated valuations leave no margin for error. A single earnings miss from a mega-cap AI player could trigger a domino effect. Regulatory risk is lurking, with both US and EU authorities mulling new rules on data privacy and algorithmic transparency. The crowding in options and structured products means any downside move could be amplified by dealer hedging and forced liquidations. In short, the risk is not just price, but positioning.
But there’s still opportunity for the nimble. The volatility spike is a gift for traders who know how to sell premium or fade crowded narratives. Look for mean-reversion setups if XLK overshoots to the downside. The $140 level is a logical place to hunt for reversals, with tight stops below $138. For those with a longer time horizon, the shakeout could set up a fresh leg higher, if, and only if, earnings deliver and the macro backdrop stabilizes. In the meantime, the playbook is simple: respect the volatility, trade the range, and don’t marry the narrative.
Strykr Take
The AI trade is entering its first real test since the hype cycle began. The market is no longer pricing in perfection, and that’s a good thing. For traders, this is a regime shift worth embracing. Volatility is back, and with it, real opportunity. Just don’t get caught chasing yesterday’s winners. The future belongs to those who can adapt, not those who believe the story never changes.
datePublished: 2026-02-02 14:01 UTC
Sources (5)
S&P 500 Hits New High, Market Retreats As Next Fed Chief Named
S&P 500 Hits New High, Market Retreats As Next Fed Chief Named
What to know about Trump's Fed chair nominee Kevin Warsh
President Donald Trump says he'll tap former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh as the next Fed chair to replace Jerome Powell in May—with Trump bel
A top economist says Kevin Warsh is a 'reasonable' choice for Fed chair, but his legacy hinges on one key issue
Moody's economist Mark Zandi says Kevin Warsh is a 'reasonable' Fed chair pick with strong credentials. Zandi says Warsh's real test will be keeping p
Jim Cramer Defends Trump: “He Brings Down Prices”
For better or for worse, Mad Money's Jim Cramer cannot be accused of being politically partisan.
AI Stocks Checkup: Weekly Moves And Who's Leading Or Lagging In 2026
One month into 2026, the leaders and laggards in artificial intelligence stocks looks a lot different. More volatility for AI stocks could be on the w
