
Strykr Analysis
NeutralStrykr Pulse 53/100. The market is paralyzed, not panicked. Threat Level 3/5. Range-bound with risk of sudden breakout.
If you’re looking for a pulse in tech, you might want to check for a heartbeat. The Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF, better known to traders as XLK, is frozen at $135.6, not a tick of movement in sight. That’s not a typo. It’s a market that’s flatlined, and it’s not just a slow news day. It’s a symptom of something deeper: the AI capex party that fueled tech’s meteoric run is suddenly colliding with a wall of skepticism, and the market’s collective hangover is setting in.
Let’s not sugarcoat it. The last 24 hours have been an exercise in risk-off discipline. Asian markets buckled, with South Korea’s regulator forced to halt trading as tech stocks got pummeled. Indonesia’s Moody’s outlook cut was the headline, but the real story is the global tech unwind. Reuters and WSJ both led with the same theme: investors are bailing on tech, spooked by the scale of AI infrastructure spending and the prospect that the easy money has already been made. XLK, the bellwether for US tech, is stuck at $135.6, refusing to confirm either a bullish bounce or a bearish breakdown. That’s not indecision. That’s paralysis.
The context is as loud as it is clear. Since October 2022, tech and AI have been the market’s golden children. Every dip was a buying opportunity. Every quarterly report was a chance to raise guidance. Nvidia, Microsoft, Alphabet, pick your favorite acronym, they all rode the same wave. But now, with headlines screaming about “massive AI capex plans” and software stocks in freefall, the narrative is shifting. The AI trade is no longer a one-way bet. It’s a crowded theater with smoke in the air, and the exits are getting smaller by the minute.
Historical analogies are dangerous, but this feels eerily like the post-dotcom reality check. Back then, it wasn’t the first selloff that mattered, it was the grinding realization that the future would arrive, just not as quickly or as profitably as everyone hoped. Today’s AI arms race is burning through cash at a rate that would make even the most aggressive 1999 venture capitalist blush. The market is starting to ask hard questions about ROI, payback periods, and whether these capex splurges are creating moats or just digging holes.
The data backs it up. Software names are leading the slide, with Bloomberg noting a “deepening selloff” as the closing bell approached. The rotation is real: utilities, energy, and banks are suddenly back in vogue, as traders hunt for anything with a yield and a defensible balance sheet. The old “growth at any price” mantra is being replaced by “show me the cash flow.”
So why is XLK stuck? Because nobody wants to be the first to blink. Bulls are clinging to the hope that this is just another shakeout before the next leg higher. Bears are wary of getting steamrolled by another AI-fueled melt-up. In the meantime, liquidity dries up, and the ETF goes comatose. It’s the market equivalent of a Mexican standoff.
Strykr Watch
Technically, XLK is pinned at $135.6, a level that’s been both support and resistance over the past month. The 50-day moving average is lurking just below at $134.8, while the 200-day sits at $131.2. RSI is neutral, hovering around 48, reflecting the market’s indecision. There’s a clear range: a break above $137 opens the door to a retest of the $140 highs, while a drop below $134 could trigger a fast move to $130. Volume has collapsed, which is often a precursor to a violent breakout, direction TBD.
Options flow is equally ambivalent. Open interest is concentrated in the $135 and $140 strikes, with put-call ratios ticking higher but not screaming panic. Implied volatility is elevated relative to historical norms, but not at crisis levels. In other words, traders are hedging, but they’re not betting the farm on a crash. Not yet.
On the macro front, the next real catalyst is likely to come from earnings season or a Fed surprise. Until then, expect more chop and more frustration for anyone trying to force a trade in a market that’s refusing to cooperate.
The risks are obvious, but they bear repeating. If AI capex guidance comes in hotter than expected, or if a major player confesses to overextending, the unwind could accelerate. Conversely, any sign that spending is translating into actual revenue growth could reignite the rally. The wildcard is the Fed: if Kevin Warsh’s nomination signals a more hawkish tilt, tech multiples could compress in a hurry.
For now, the opportunity is in patience. There’s no glory in being early to a reversal that hasn’t happened yet. But if XLK breaks out of its range, the move could be explosive. Traders should be ready to pounce, not predict.
Strykr Take
This is what a regime change looks like. The AI trade isn’t dead, but it’s no longer the only game in town. XLK’s freeze at $135.6 is a warning shot: the market is re-pricing risk, and tech is no longer bulletproof. Stay nimble, respect the range, and don’t get married to last year’s winners. The next big move will be fast, and it will punish anyone caught napping.
Sources (5)
Tech-led selloff drags Asian stocks; Indonesia tumbles on Moody's outlook cut
South Korean equities extended declines on Friday as investors continue to retreat from tech stocks, while Indonesian shares fell over 2% after Moody'
Asian Stocks Fall Amid Growing Investor Anxiety Over Massive AI Capex Plans
In an indication of sharp swings in regional benchmark indexes, South Korea's stock-market regulator briefly halted trading on the main exchange.
What Utilities, Energy, Industrials, and Banks Could Tell Stock Market
Tech stocks and the AI trade have powered global markets ever since the bull run began in October 2022. This year's gains, which include record highs
Bitcoin Is The Noise, Google Is The Signal: Buying The 'Industrial Revolution'
The coming regime change at the Fed could squeeze excess out of the market. It may be starting with Bitcoin.
Why Kevin Warsh could bring a new outlook to the Fed
Allianz chief economic adviser Mohamed El-Erian and Unleash Prosperity principal Phil Kerpen discuss Kevin Warsh's nomination for Fed chair and how Pr
